CompareAI models

Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Ling 3.0 Flash FinInclusionaiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Qwen3.8 Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	73/100	80/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	85/100	61/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Qwen

Inclusionai

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Qwen

Inclusionai

Pricing

Input

$0.15/ 1M

$0.07/ 1M

Output

$0.47/ 1M

$0.22/ 1M

Cached input

$0.02/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

145K

126K

Completed sessions

1,029,993

3,409,055

Token share

0.22%

0.28%

Tokens

1.9T+100%

2.4T+100%

AUG 6SEP 30

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

60%5.5K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 FlashJamba Mini Nearby alternativeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba MiniLing 3.0 Flash FinJamba Mini Related comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba LargeQwen3.8 FlashJamba Large Related comparisonLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba LargeLing 3.0 Flash FinJamba Large