CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 63/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 47/100 | 46/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.27/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$1.08/ 1M
$2.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0054/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.1M
0
Completed sessions
19,447,336
0
Token share
15%
0%
Tokens
131T+100%
00%
AUG 6SEP 30
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.4%102K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Jamba Large