CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5.2 CodexOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 63/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-5.2 Codex | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 20/100 | 18/100 | 70/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.27/ 1M
$1.40/ 1M
Output
$1.08/ 1M
$11/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0054/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.1M
0
Completed sessions
19,339,089
2
Token share
15%
0%
Tokens
131T+100%
00%
AUG 6SEP 30
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.4%102K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-5.2 Codex vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.2 Codex·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-5.2 Codex vs Jamba LargeGPT-5.2 Codex·Jamba Large