CompareAI models
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- GPT-4oOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 100/100 | 84/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| GPT-4o | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 25/100 | 19/100 | 18/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
128K
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
920K
0
Completed sessions
296,926,271
12
Token share
16%
0%
Tokens
140T+100%
00%
AUG 6SEP 30
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.5%24K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-4o vs Jamba MiniGPT-4o·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-4o vs Jamba LargeGPT-4o·Jamba Large