CompareAI models
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- GPT-5.1 Codex MaxOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 100/100 | 84/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| GPT-5.1 Codex Max | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 28/100 | 70/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$8.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
921K
0
Completed sessions
297,864,176
1
Token share
16%
0%
Tokens
140T+100%
00%
AUG 6SEP 30
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.5%24K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-5.1 Codex Max vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.1 Codex Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-5.1 Codex Max vs Jamba LargeGPT-5.1 Codex Max·Jamba Large